Rift vs. Enso
Rift Research
Last updated
TLDR: Rift is an aggregator with best price execution. It includes Enso and all other supported venues in its routes. Rift adds 0 fee on the route, so you are guaranteed at least as good a rate as going to Enso directly. If Enso has the best route, Rift gives you that route with no added fee.
Enso focuses on intent-based shortcuts and aggregated DeFi actions. Rift is an aggregator for cross-chain routes on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Hyperliquid, RobinhoodChain, Tempo, XLayer, Ink and Pharos. They sit at different layers of the stack.
Short version
| Dimension | Rift | Enso |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Aggregator | Intent shortcuts / DeFi action layer |
| Fee | Zero added fee on every route | Depends on route and action |
| Scope | Cross-chain on supported chains | Broader DeFi actions and shortcuts |
| Best for | Cross-chain best price execution | Complex or multi-step DeFi intents |
Where each wins
Enso wins when:
- You need aggregated or multi-step DeFi actions beyond a simple swap
- Intent shortcuts reduce complexity for the user
Rift wins when:
- The job is a clean cross-chain swap on its supported chains
- You want best price execution with zero added fee
Key differences
Enso is closer to an intent and action layer. Rift is a cross-chain aggregator. Rift includes Enso in its venue set where the route overlaps. If Enso has the best rate, Rift gives you that rate with no added fee.
When to use which
- Use Enso for broader intent/DeFi shortcut use cases.
- Use Rift for straightforward cross-chain swaps on its supported chains when you want best price execution at zero added fee.