Rift vs. SwapKit
Rift Research
Last updated
TLDR: Rift is an aggregator with best price execution. It includes the same native venues SwapKit surfaces (THORChain, Chainflip, Garden and others) in its routes. Rift adds 0 fee on the route, so you are guaranteed at least as good a rate as the winning underlying venue. If that venue has the best route, Rift gives you that route with no added fee.
SwapKit is a multi-protocol aggregator focused on native cross-chain swaps. Rift is an aggregator on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Hyperliquid, RobinhoodChain, Tempo, XLayer, Ink and Pharos.
Short version
| Dimension | Rift | SwapKit |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Aggregator | Aggregator of native cross-chain protocols |
| Fee | Zero added fee | Depends on underlying protocol + any aggregator layer |
| Chains | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Hyperliquid, RobinhoodChain, Tempo, XLayer, Ink and Pharos | Broader (via THORChain, Chainflip, etc.) |
| Focus | Best price execution with zero added fee | Native cross-chain aggregation |
| Best for | Zero added fee on supported chains | Access to multiple native protocols in one interface |
Where each wins
SwapKit wins when:
- You want one interface over several native protocols (THORChain, Chainflip, etc.)
- You need chains or pairs outside Rift’s support
Rift wins when:
- You want best price execution with zero added fee
- Your routes stay on Rift’s supported chains
Key differences
Both aggregate native protocols. Rift includes those venues in its routes. When one of them wins, Rift gives you that venue’s rate with no added fee.
When to use which
- Use SwapKit when you want broad native-protocol coverage in one place.
- Use Rift when you want best price execution with zero added fee on its supported chains.